An IIPM Initiative
Sunday, September 27, 2026
 
 

TSI

Financial crisis : China to the rescue? Never!

 

The 30-year-old US-China partnership is about to undergo a radical restructuring
TSI | Issue Dated: January 4, 2009
Tags : oil paintings | starter homes | Dafen | Hong Kong | mass-produced artwork | knockoffs | masterpieces | Zhou Xiaohong | Art Industry Association | Sunday Morning Post | Western property market | economic engine | Niall Ferguson | Chimerica | Treasury Bills | Communist Party | subprime mortgages | Stephen Roach | Morgan Stanley Asia | Fred Hu | Greater China | Goldman Sachs | social security | health insurance | unemployment insurance | Top Form International | bra maker | financial climate | global downturn | Frank Gong | China research | JPMorgan Chase |
 
Financial crisis : China to the rescue? Never! Thomas Friedman

Economist and NYT Columnist

I had no idea that many of those oil paintings that hang in hotel rooms and starter homes across America are actually produced by just one Chinese village, Dafen, north of Hong Kong. And I had no idea that Dafen’s artist colony – the world’s leading centre for mass-produced artwork and knockoffs of masterpieces – had been devastated by the bursting of the US housing bubble. I should have, though.

“American property owners and hotels were usually the biggest consumers of Dafen’s works,” Zhou Xiaohong, deputy head of Art Industry Association of Dafen, told Hong Kong’s “Sunday Morning Post.” “The more houses built in the US, the more walls that needed our paintings. Now our business has frozen following the crash of the Western property market.”

Dafen is just one of a million Chinese and American enterprises that constitute the most important economic engine in the world today – what historian Niall Ferguson calls “Chimerica”, the de facto partnership between Chinese savers and producers and US spenders and borrowers. That 30-year-old partnership is about to undergo a radical restructuring due to current economic crisis, and then its outcome will impact the global economy.

After all, it was China’s willingness to hold the dollars and Treasury Bills it had earned from exporting to America that helped keep US interest rates low, giving Americans the money they needed to buy shoes, flat-screen TVs and paintings from China, as well as homes in America. Americans then borrowed against those homes to consume even more – one reason we enjoyed rising wealth without rising incomes.

This division of labour not only nourished our respective economies, but also shaped our politics. It enabled China’s ruling Communist Party to say to its people: “We will guarantee you ever-higher standards of living, and in return you will stay out of politics and let us rule.” So China’s leaders could enjoy double-digit growth without political reform. And it enabled successive US administrations, particularly the current one, to tell Americans:

“You can have guns and butter – subprime mortgages with nothing down and nothing to pay for two years, ever-higher consumption and two wars, without tax increases!” It all worked – until it didn’t. With unemployment now soaring across the US, said Stephen Roach, the chairman of Morgan Stanley Asia, Americans – “the most overextended consumer in world history” – can no longer buy so many Chinese exports. We need to save more, invest more, consume less and throw out most of our credit cards to bail ourselves out of this crisis.

But as that happens, we need China to take our discarded credit cards and distribute them to its own people so that they can buy more of what China produces and more imports from the rest of the world. That’s the only way Beijing can sustain the minimum eight per cent growth it needs to maintain the political bargain between China’s leaders and led – not to mention pick up some of the slack in the global economy from America’s slowdown.

However, if I’ve learned one thing here, it’s just how hard doing that will be. China’s whole system and culture nourish saving, not spending, and changing that will require a huge “cultural and structural” shift, said Fred Hu, chairman for Greater China for Goldman Sachs. In China, for instance, to buy a home you have to put at least 20 per cent down, and the average is 40 per cent. If you try to walk away from the mortgage, the bank will come after your personal assets. Moreover, China can’t just shift production from the US market to its own consumers. Not many Chinese villagers want to buy $400 tennis shoes or Christmas tree ornaments.

Also, China has no real social security, health insurance or unemployment insurance. Without that social safety net, it’s hard to see how Chinese don’t end up saving most of their stimulus. “You open up the newspaper every day, and you hear about this factory shutting down or that supplier going belly-up,” said Willie Fung, whose company, Top Form International, is the world’s leading bra maker. “You can never be too careful in this financial climate.” As such, “the world should not have a false hope that China can cushion the global downturn”, by stimulating its domestic demand in a big way, said Frank Gong, head of China research for JPMorgan Chase. “The best thing China can do is keep its own economy stable.”

It’s good advice. China is not going to rescue the world economy. We will have to get out of this crisis the old-fashioned way: by digging inside ourselves and getting back to basics – improving US productivity, saving more, studying harder and inventing more stuff to export. The days of phony prosperity – I borrow cheap money from China to build a house and then borrow on that house to buy cheap paintings from China to decorate my walls and everybody is a winner – are over.
Rate this article:
Bad Good    
Current Rating 0
 
 
Post CommentsPost Comments




Issue Dated: Feb 5, 2017