An IIPM Initiative
Monday, May 27, 2019
 
 

Falling in Line

 

SHASTRI RAMACHANDARAN | New Delhi, February 17, 2012 16:30
Tags : Anglo-American journalism | Chinese bosses (Assistants to the EiC) |
 

 

Working as a journalist in China’s newspapers can be an eye-opening and engaging experience, revealing unsuspected potential and unforeseen possibilities. Such work, more often than not, is with the state media. To make the most of the situation, it is necessary to leave behind a lifetime’s misconceptions and prejudices.
My life as an expatriate journalist in Beijing began with China Daily (CD) – the country’s oldest English daily brought out by a department of the Information Ministry. The Editor in Chief (EiC) is said to enjoy the rank of Vice Premier, with all the powers of that office, barring the one that allows issue of visas.
In his first circle of power are deputy editors in chief, though the designation could be anything. Title, authority, power, functions, responsibility are not necessarily matched as we know them to be in India, in the world of Anglo-American journalism, or in the continent. Beneath this layer are a large number of assistants to the EiC and the day and night editors. A notch above, but below the first rung, are editors who keep an eye on the day/night editors and the assistants.
These ubiquitous assistants are the eyes and ears of the EiC, and, perhaps, of the government, the party and the state, too. Some view them as competent editors and tested journalists who should not be trifled with merely because of their unflattering designation and unassuming disposition. Others see these assistants, at best, as factotums; and, at worst, as sheepdogs, who keep the flock, including expats (also called ‘foreign experts’), from ‘straying’; or, falling prey to journalistic practices for which CD has little use. 
The assistants keep track of everything anddon’t miss a trick. They have at their command loyalist expats who do their every bidding, against their own countrymen. Servitude to these assistants is the surest way to survive and succeed – as “successful” expats, including from India, learned early on. These expats jealously guard their position by keeping out their other countrymen, unless these newcomers are willing to become as, if not more, abject as them in their “performance”. The expat’s journalistic competence does not decide his or her place/role in CD.
Yet this paper pays the best package and looks after its staff very well. If you are free of notions of journalism acquired elsewhere, carry out every wish of the Chinese bosses (Assistants to the EiC) as your command and feel pleased and privileged to perform like a flea – then you can collect a tidy sum and live it up. Nobody will tell you to your face that you suck; that you are a sly and sleazy lowlife; and that your ‘success’ (as a survivor) is 
because you, as the factotum’s pup, are a trusty doormat. 
Inevitably, the journalist who values independence, integrity and self-esteem moves out of CD. S/he heads to Xinhua, the Chinese news agency, which is a state within the state. In today’s global conditions, Xinhua,the most powerful, successful and profitable news agency, is home to “economic refugees” from the West, who lost their jobs in leading media organisations particularly in the US and the UK.
The expat journalist barely stands out in Xinhua because this agency’s universe is huge and it pays less than CD. Yet Xinhua is the acme for the Chinese, and the expat here is a contented soul with the job not straining his self-respect. Xinhua’s brand of journalism may be alien, but s/he gladly does a job (editing text/copy, which does not call for his kind of journalistic values or judgment) to the institution’s satisfaction.
The expat has no complaint against Xinhua’s culture (as an organisation, not as a media/journalism entity). The hours are shorter, there’s more leave, a paid annual holiday, good cafeterias and, as a US journalist said, no pressure to “perform like a flea”. Xinhua may be an institution of state, but unlike other media biggies, it is a rule-maker. It lays down the line, not just abides by it.
The other magnet for expats is the English daily Global Times, from Party-run People’s Daily stable, which has for long been publishing the Chinese language Global Times. The pay is a shade lower than in CD, from where many expats moved to GT. They feel the pay cut is well worth the shift.
Often praised as the Fox News of China, Global Times is young, and has a robust journalistic air about it.The editors are visible, accessible, hands-on and in close daily working contact with the staff.It may be subject to the same limitations as CD and other Chinese media outlets, but it does not let the restrictions and opacity kill the buzz about the place. 
I had a terrific time in GT. Most expats tend to assume censorship and restrictions even where they don’t exist. Expats told me that the signed editorial comment space was strictly for the Chinese to articulate what the bosses order. That may be true nine out of 10 times, but there’s the one-tenth chance at which you can take a shot. I did and was surprised that they welcomed my piece – on a topic at the centre of Chinese politics. I had pulled no punches, but the editors who keep an eagle eye against transgressions, said I was not critical enough – the subject called for sharper criticism. 
Expats are so keen on their byline and, at the same time, wanting to please that most of them end up writing superficial, touristy and ‘lifestyle’ pieces. Rare is the expat who has not written about negotiating his way in China. They write about how they use chopsticks, make hand-pulled noodles, bargain over baubles and buy foodstuff, fruits and vegetables as if these are adventures unknown to humans. 
The few who venture beyond such pathetic pieces are respected in GT. For instance, I wrote on the Bhopal gas leak judgment (after 26 years) not doing justice to the victims in contrast to how the US made BP pay billions for the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. The comment questioned India’s claim to be a global power when it could not protect the interests of its people or raise their concerns at the world’s high tables such as the G-8. I had bracketed China in the same league for letting down developing countries and, at times, its own people on the world stage. When the piece did not come back immediately with the editor’s okay, I went in to ask whether the reference to China was holding it up.
On the contrary, he said, you have not hit China hard enough for its failure to speak up for the Bhopal victims and against US multinationals. Therefore, he was wondering whether my piece would “suffice in itself” or he should write another side piece on China’s lapses in this regard. 
GT is the new kid on the block. Launched in April 2009, it has caused a stir and nudged a stodgy CD to re-invent itself. When GT announced a metro pull-out, CD came out with one a few days earlier. 
Now there are journalists moving from GT to CD. This change in the air can only bring good – more vibrancy to the state media. 
For all the media restrictions in China, there remain unexplored possibilities and spaces. The boundaries can be pushed a bit further, and tested.You never know how far you can go unless you try.
 
Rate this article:
Bad Good    
Current Rating 3.0
Next Story

Next Story

 
 
Post CommentsPost Comments
Posted By: Mark Hughes | China | May 1st 2012 | 05:05
What a damning and unfair piece on past colleagues. It shows no appreciation of what really goes on.




Issue Dated: Feb 5, 2017